Categories
Self-help

How to Live a Better Life with Philosophy (Part 1)

“Philosophy is the practice of death” – Plato

Philosophy, as most people understand it concerns one thing: how a person lives. In philosophy, it is called ethics. 

Ethics in Philosophy and How to Live

The two schools of thoughts, Epicureanism and Stoicism, are both schools of thoughts in ethics. However, they both vouched for different views of life – views that differ from each other so much that one can say they are both rivals. 

How to Live Better with Epicureanism

Epicureanism was started by Epicurus (surprise) in the very early days of Greece. Epicureanism is most famous for being the proponent of hedonism, which enjoyment of pleasure takes the utmost importance. But that is a wrong view of Epicureanism and a grossly oversimplification of hedonism in general.

Epicureanism
The Collector

For Epicurus, the goal of a person’s life is happiness, and happiness consists of the absence of pain.

Here we need to explain what is the definition of pain in Epicureanism. For Epicurus, pain includes both physical pain and mental troubles. Physical pain can be easily understood – no one wants to be hit by another out of malice, or suffering from illness that hurts the body. 

Mental troubles require some further explanation.

One of the primary mental troubles for everyone is the fear of death. We are all scared of dying. Sometimes, in the middle of night, when we think about our finite lifespan, we are gripped by this irrational fear that resembles an actual grip on our heart. This in turn generates a huge source of anxiety in our lives, thinking about things such as: “What happens after I die?” “Does my life matter?” “How do I make the most out of my life?”

Additionally, Epicurus also includes mental troubles we experience as a result of our growth. One such example would be claustrophobia. It is a result of events that happened out of our control, and we develop a fear of narrow spaces. Epicurus seeks to eliminate such troubles as well, either via self meditation or in modern terms, therapy. The goal is to eliminate all these pains from ourselves so as to pursue happiness without any restrictions.

So it is not hard to see why Epicurus considers the free from pain the best way to achieve happiness. Or in latin terms, eudaimonia (which meant happiness in general, or the flourishing of humanity). Free from both physical and mental pain, we are free to pursue what we truly love, and enjoy the unburdened state of happiness.

Pursue Your Desires, Avoid Pain

But how should we pursue this happiness?

Putting it simply: pursue your desires. These desires have many forms, such as the desire to be healthy, the desire to eat good food or the desire to be wealthy.

Some desires are considered more necessary than the other, but for our current purpose it suffices. The important part is this: by pursuing these desires, it is of importance that we lessen the pain we experience.

Happiness, in Epicureanism, is the lack of pain. This is why descending into a drug-fueled frenzy is not the proper pursuit of happiness – for it brings about many painful after effects. 

Additionally, Epicurus touted friendship as one of the most necessary aspects of a person’s happiness. As humans are social animals, it is imperative that we form social bonds with one another. Through the formation of friendship can true happiness be found, as we enjoy the company and assistance of one another.

How to Live Better with Stoicism

Stoicism
Pexels

Stoicism, as the name implies, presents a stoic way of life to its audience. For a Stoic, happiness is “living in accordance with nature”. While this sentence alone has spawned hundreds of thesis, for our sake we can understand it as possessing that which is genuinely good.

So what is that which is genuinely good?

For the Stoics, that is virtue. The virtue of wisdom, of logos, of being courageous and being true to justice. Everything else is unnecessary. Taken to the extreme, it can be said that a person can live in extreme poverty, experience starvation and be hated by everyone – but as long as the person is virtuous, he is happy.

Why would the Stoics say this? 

In the material philosophy of Stoicism, the world is deterministic. What this meant is that everything that is bound to happen, will happen. If you are bound to be poor, then it is destined that you will remain poor. The only thing you possess control is your inner state of mind

If so, why not lash out against the world?

Because virtues are necessary for a person’s well being. Let’s say you are destined to be imprisoned for life. You can hate the person for putting you behind bars, or you can hate the guards caning you. But this has already been set in stone – whatever you feel, your fate does not change.

Stoicism then proposed that we practice the virtue of acceptance and happiness in your heart. Reconcile with the fact that you are imprisoned and understand that this is what the world has given you.

Stoicism Control
The Stoic Sage

Then understand that you have one thing that is completely in your control: your inner mind. There, in your mind, contains all the freedom you have.

Why would you be angry at a hurricane destroying the town? It is merely nature. Similarly, why be angry at fate torturing you? It is only physical pain – external factors that are already set in stone. If you can be happy even in times of pain, then you have achieved happiness at every time.

Similarly, why do we fear death? Contrary to the Epicureans, the Stoics welcome death, for it is merely another part of the cycle. Why are you afraid of something that is going to happen? In fact, rather radically, Stoics advocates the practice of suicide: if you are already of old age and are losing your faculties, committing suicide does not sound like a bad idea. Better to die at a time of your choosing (notwithstanding the deterministic nature of the world) than let old age claim you.

(To be continued in “How Can Philosophy Help You Live: Part 2”.)

Categories
Self-help

3 Quick and Practical Steps to Overcome FOMO [A Philosophical Guide]

Global FOMO

The pandemic has been a whirlwind for all of us. Some have thrived by building beautiful things in the midst of lockdown. Some lost their jobs, opportunities and even their loved ones.

FOMO
Literary Yard

But there’s one thing all of us that we can agree on — the sense of loss and isolation that we’re going through, or what millennials could describe as “Global FOMO”

For some parts of the world that are going through lockdown, it’s the loss of being able to connect with friends and relatives. Not being able to go out and wander around without a mask. Personally, I was uncomfortable with the lack of progress, both at a personal and societal level.

For some parts of the world that are going through lockdown, it’s the loss of being able to connect with friends and relatives. Not being able to go out and wander around without a mask. Personally, I was uncomfortable with the lack of progress, both at a personal and societal level.

As a global community, we are more divided than ever, culturally, politically and socially. We see beautiful movements clash with not so beautiful ones and people avoiding people due to their ethnicity or colour being associated with the disease. It’s a global mess.

How can we make sense of this meaningless and complicated situation that we’re in? Here are three steps to overcome FOMO in such trying times.

#1 Overcome FOMO by understanding that there are some things that we can’t control.

Let’s face it. There’ll always be things that are beyond our control in life.

The pandemic is just one of the very few examples of this and embracing it in this period of time is more relevant than ever.

Stoicism Dichotomy of Control
The Stoic Sage

Having said that, this does not mean that we should simply just accept and give up. Rather, we should let this realisation make us aware that there are things that are within our control, at least to a limited extent.

For instance, we can change how we react towards events that happen to us by revisiting our interpretations towards them. This is exactly how some business owners manage to overcome the adversity that befell on them as a result of the pandemic.

They focused on things within their control, looking for ways to turn their business around and at the same time knowing when to give up and let go.

Therefore, in the case of overcoming global FOMO, it’s not just accepting that missed opportunities is part of life, but also being able to figure out the things that you could make out of your current situation and act upon them. As Otto Scharmer beautifully frames some questions for us to contemplate:

“What if we used this disruption as an opportunity to let go of everything that isn’t essential in our life, in our work, and in our institutional routines? How might we reimagine how we live and work together?”

Otto Scharmer

#2 Overcome FOMO by embracing the certain-uncertainty.

Nihilism
Pexels

Many would be quick to think how COVID-19 has made everything unstable and uncertain in a span of a few weeks. But is it justified to blame a single event for everything that has happened?

Consider Kiekergaard’s contemplation on death being an uncertain-certainty. In Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions, he explains that everybody knows that we will die someday, we just don’t know when.

Since death is an uncertain-certainty, it also applies to our existence as well, that life is also a kind of certain-uncertainty.

As Professor Stokes puts it, it’s not that COVID-19 has suddenly made the world uncertain. Rather, it shows how uncertain our lives are all along; how human existence and the social structures in which it is depended upon are so fragile and can easily turn upside-down.

Not to mention our lack of progress on global existential risks. It’s no surprise, but does it mean that we should simply give up? Certainly not.

#3 Overcome FOMO by not giving in to nihilism by remembering that you are not alone.

“What we learn in time of pestilence: that there are more things to admire in men than to despise.”

Albert Camus, The Plague

Not to mention our lack of progress on global existential risks. It’s no surprise, but does it mean that we should simply give up? Certainly not.

In the midst of the widespread suffering right now, we may start to question whether human existence as we know it has any value or meaning. Is this all worth it?

Nihilism
Pexels

If we agree with nihilism which is the idea that human existence has no value, then consider this. How is it possible that there are countless healthcare professionals in the frontlines working tirelessly to fight the pandemic? What are they thinking and feeling in these moments?

Perhaps it’s the sense of community working to fight the disease together; understanding that they’re not alone in their suffering or having a sense of duty and responsibility towards those who are suffering.

We can’t imagine what is going through their minds, but we can safely assume that they aren’t giving in to nihilism. At least not completely.

The same applies to caregivers, social injustice advocates and other professions who often witness lots of seemingly pointless suffering.

Their efforts show that although there may be times where there is pointless suffering, it doesn’t necessarily mean that we should give in to nihilism.

Furthermore, if we expand our worldview by not putting ourselves at the centre of everything but rather putting ourselves as part of a larger, interconnected system, then we may realise that we are definitely not alone in this seemingly meaningless suffering.

Perhaps we will never understand the meaning of life and human existence or even perhaps the world we live in is meaningless. Either way, we shouldn’t give in to nihilism. Because after all we’re human and as human beings we always seek for meaning in our lives, regardless whether there is meaning in human existence. Feeling FOMO might just be an instinctual response to what’s happening all around us but it doesn’t mean we should give up.

Categories
Self-help Work

Kant Stop Procrastinating? How to Stop Procrastination [A Guide from Kantian Philosophy]

There are some days when I feel extremely lazy and I wish I did not have to wash my dishes after I eat or write this essay. A part of me whispers, “May, let’s watch a couple more YouTube videos, shall we? Let’s be free to do anything we desire!” I would then slump onto my bed and laze around, enjoying my freedom.

But am I actually free? Some philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant, might say no.

There are two concepts of freedom or liberty in philosophy – positive and negative freedom.

Negative Freedom

Negative Freedom
Pexels

Negative freedom comes from the absence of barriers against one’s actions. One is free when one can do what one wants without the presence of any obstacles. This is the type of freedom that we are usually accustomed to. The freedom that I envisioned when I lay on my bed, scrolling through videos, is of this type because I am doing what I desire.

Positive Freedom

Positive Freedom
Pexels

Kant claims that we are only free when we follow rules.

What? How can I be free when I am constrained by rules?! But hold on, there is more to Kant’s claim. 

The rules cannot be just any rules; they have to be our rules. In other words, we are only free when we abide by the rules that we make ourselves.

The rules cannot be just any rules; they have to be our rules. In other words, we are only free when we abide by the rules that we make ourselves.

The rules have to be our rules.

The second part of Kant’s claim─that the rules have to be our rules─is probably on more familiar ground. It would be more interesting to put this in a political context.

We usually consider the citizens of a democratic country to be freer than those of a totalitarian country because the former actually have a say in the laws that they follow.

Depending on the degree of democracy practised in the country, the citizens are free because they make their own laws and abide by these laws. Similarly, we would think that, as an individual, we are free when we follow our own rules and decisions instead of others’.

How about the first part of Kant’s claim ─ that we are free when we follow rules? In order to understand what he means, we have to first know his idea of a human being.

Kant, like many other earlier philosophers, thought that human beings are imperfect rational beings. Even though we have the power of reason, we are also governed by our inclinations.

This human nature to desire is deemed inferior compared to the power of reason (this claim is also famously discussed in Plato’s The Republic). This is because inclinations are similarly present in other beings such as animals; hence, what really separates us from them is our rationality.

Only humans have the power of reason (animal experts can fight with Kant on this but please spare me).

Therefore, when we follow our inclinations or desires rather than our reason, we have fallen to a lower plane of beings. We fail to act beyond our mere impulses and appetites. We become slaves to our irrational passions.

Positive Freedom
Pexels

However, when we listen to our reason, we break free from the chains of our passions and we gain our freedom. And how do we listen to our reason? We use it to make a law and follow it (only rational beings are capable of acting according to laws). 

In a broader sense, positive freedom can be defined as the control a person has over herself whereas negative freedomcan be thought of as the absence of obstacles to oneself — a difference between internal versus external factors that determine one’s freedom. Kant’s freedom is the positive kind.

How to Stop Procrastination with Kantian Philosophy

Procrastination
psycom.net

How does all of these connect to how Kant helps me not to procrastinate?

When I find myself spending an hour writing only a sentence because I keep getting distracted by YouTube or Twitter, I tell myself: “May! Kant’s now frowning at you because you are only listening to your irrational desires even though you need to submit this essay.” I know that, rationally, I need to really finish writing and so I follow my reason and make a law for myself: I have to write at least one page by 10 pm. Whenever I start to lose my focus again, I remember Kant (sometimes I would crazily mutter Kant, Kant, Kant) to motivate myself to keep working in order to exercise my positive freedom.

This is not only helpful for my academics but also for many other aspects of my life. When I want to sleep in and skip working out, I think of Kant and I would get out of my bed immediately. When I am about to press the ‘Next episode’ button on Netflix at 3.34 am, after watching 8 consecutive episodes of a show, despite knowing that I will get a headache for not sleeping enough, I think of Kant and I would shake my head and declare under my breath, “I refuse to be governed by this incredibly addictive show and I will practise my rationality and exercise my freedom by going to sleep now.” 

In general, whenever you start to put off doing something (e.g., work, sleep, eat) for no good reasons, you can try to fight against the tendency by reflecting on how this can threaten your free will.

Ask yourself: Am I really a slave to my desires? Is my will not free to escape my irrational passions? If you decide that you want to exercise your positive freedom, then make a rule for yourself to complete the work that you need to do and follow it! 

Of course, I do not think that negative freedom is bad and, despite the label, it does not mean that it should be negatively perceived.

After all, we do exercise negative freedom most of the time. This is my vote and no one else can influence it. I want to wear this and I do not need others to agree. I choose to say this without any restrictions. But what I hope to do in this article is to suggest an alternative philosophical perspective that you can take when you need some motivation to (or not to) pursue something.

Categories
Self-help Society

The Dark Truth of Human Nature: Comparative Self-Love Is Corrupting Us On Social Media

The widespread use of social media in this digital age has undeniably brought about new advantages as well as new challenges as social norms have been redefined to account for this new, integral part of human society. The ease of connectivity helped people who were isolated during the pandemic to stay connected with people they couldn’t physically meet.

“Social media has played a vital role in combating loneliness and anxiety, which we know have crept up during the outbreak.”

Katie Gilsenan

We have also seen social platforms serve as a virtual learning tool to help carry out non-physical classes and lectures. Digital solidarity across the globe has also helped spread awareness on the #BlackLivesMatter movement during trying times. However, despite its benefits, we can draw parallels with Rousseau’s conception of the corruption of man in civil society and social media’s corruption of man.

Rousseau on Human Nature and Social Media

To briefly explain Rousseau’s argument, Rousseau argues that man in the natural state is solitary. Man is devoid of interaction, independent and only possesses what Rousseau calls Amour de Soi Meme. Amour de Soi Meme in its simplicity, is self-preservation, and so, in our natural state there is no need for interaction.

As we enter society, Rousseau argues that a new unnatural property, Amour Propre which is self-love, comes into play. Man begins to interact with others and starts forming dependencies, disrupting the independence of man in the natural state.

The comparative aspect of Amour Propre entices men to make comparisons amongst themselves, and leads to their desire to be valued in the eyes of others. This dependency creates inequalities to Rousseau, as the weak become the subordinate, and the strong become the superior.

Our Self-Love Nature Causes Us Harm on Social Media

Social Media
Pexels

On an individual level, social media serves as an easily accessible platform for users to compare and contrasts themselves with others.

With information and data being so readily available within a few clicks, man is now more able than ever to be engrossed in comparisons and we can see how this heightens their desire to be valued highly in the eyes of others. In order to do so, users use social media as a platform to promote material wealth and lifestyles in the name of improving their social standings.

At the end of the day, the projection and construction of this online avatarism becomes a misrepresentation of the self, and whilst this may seem harmless at first glance, the effects of this stretch out to others as well.

Other users viewing the profile of someone seemingly perfect may end up doubting their self-worth and this has serious implications on mental health. This desire to be perceived not only in a positive manner, but in a superior manner relative to others exacerbates existing non-digital inequalities.

The nature of social media in itself has transformed vastly throughout the decade, starting off as a platform to connect and interact with others, MySpace being one of the pioneers.

Surveillance Capitalism and Data Mining Further Amplifies the Problem

Surveillance Capitalism
Pexels

Although on surface level, the platforms that exist now still focus on connecting people, a lot of what we see is focused on the exploitation and manipulation of its users, in the name of corporations making financial gains through surveillance capitalism and data mining.

Social media has transformed into a marketplace whereby users’ data has become the product, and corporations buy such data to personalise marketing strategies in order to boost profits.

“Its success depends upon one-way-mirror operations engineered for our ignorance and wrapped in a fog of misdirection, euphemism and mendacity.”

Shoshana Zuboff, The New York Times

Surveillance capitalism and data mining only amplifies the problems discussed earlier, as already glory-seeking individuals are fed with ads and profiles of people like them, causing them to want to be more like someone else.

Users are fed with ads of products that aim to tackle the biggest insecurities through the platform’s algorithm based on recent searches, engagements and shares. Such only promotes man to want to further deviate away from their true self and for Rousseau, the desire to be someone you are not ultimately leads to man’s corruption.

Different Aspects of Amour Propre or Self-Love

Self-Love
Pexels

It is important to distinguish the different aspects of Amour Propre, and although Rousseau himself doesn’t clearly do so, readings of his other works, Emile (On Education) and The Social Contract, suggest so. Amour Propre, like many other properties, isn’t necessarily bad. Amour Propre (self-love) is relatively harmless when it isn’t relative to others, making it egalitarian.

The problem arises when it is relative and comparative, and this is often called inegalitarian Amour Propre.

Similarly, social media isn’t necessarily bad. As we have seen above, there are both positive and negative aspects to it.

However, consistent with Rousseau’s argument that Amour Propre is the main cause of man’s corruption, we see that the negative aspects of social media are due to inegalitarian Amour Propre as the problems discussed earlier were all attributed to comparisons and relativity with others. 

Practical Steps to Protect Yourself from the Psychological Harms of Social Media

Ultimately, our next practical step would be to address the problems that stem from inegalitarian Amour Propre.

In summary, we see that Rousseau’s account of the corruption of man entering civil society is almost perfectly exemplified by the emergence of social media, and as users ourselves, we must be aware of the psychological harms it can cause. We have seen that social media can be utilised in a positive and empowering way and we must strive towards this exact use. Educating users on what exactly they are getting into when using social media is extremely important, even more so for the younger users of social media as well as education on online etiquette and ways to ensure personal security and protection. 

To end this, below are some precautionary steps and countermeasures to protect oneself from the harms of social media set forth in the drama-documentary “The Social Dilemma” (2020):

  1. Turn off notifications or reduce the number of notifications you receive
  2. Uninstall social media and news apps that are wasting time
  3. Use a search engine that doesn’t store search history, like Qwant
  4. Use browser extensions to block recommendations
  5. Fact-check before sharing, liking, or commenting when the information looks surprising
  6. Obtain sources of information with different perspectives, including sources one might disagree with
  7. Never accept recommended videos on YouTube, Facebook or anywhere
  8. Try to avoid any clickbait material
  9. Keep devices out of the bedroom after a certain time
  10. Do not allow social media use until children reach high school